Contact Us for a Free Consultation 504-226-6200

Blog

United States Supreme Court Votes To Uphold The “Dual Sovereignty” Doctrine

Posted by Alex K. Kriksciun | Jun 24, 2019 | 0 Comments

Last week, in a 7-2 split, the United States Supreme Court held that the “dual sovereignty” doctrine does not violate the Double Jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment.  The Double Jeopardy clause states that no person “shall . . . be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb.”  Sounds easy, right?  Put differently, a person who has been subject to “jeopardy” via a criminal prosecution cannot be put in jeopardy again if that person has been acquitted of the crime.  Or in even simpler terms, if you are acquitted of a criminal offense, you can't be tried again on the same offense. 

Essentially, the dual sovereignty doctrine allows both the federal government and a state to prosecute an individual for the same conduct.  As Justice Alito's majority opinion put it, “a crime under one sovereign's laws is not ‘the same offence' [under the text of the Double Jeopardy Clause] as a crime under the laws of another sovereign.” In other words, the Double Jeopardy clause does not bar a state from “prosecut[ing] a defendant under state law even if the Federal Government has prosecuted him for the same conduct under a federal statute,” and vice versa.  The rationale behind the doctrine is that a federal "offense" is different than a state "offense" and that they therefore not the "same offense[s]" under the Double Jeopardy clause.  According to the doctrine, both a state and the federal government are "sovereign," which is where the term dual sovereignty derives from.

If you have been charged with a state criminal offense OR a federal criminal offense, make sure you call the Law Office of Alex Kriksciun today!

About the Author

Alex K. Kriksciun

Attorney at Law/Notary Public Alex K. Kriksciun has devoted most of his legal career to defending the rights of people accused of crimes and the rights of people harmed by the negligence of others.  Whether the case involves a municipal citation, a life imprisonment without parole case, a wrongf...

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Menu